<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Those Obscene Octuplets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/those-obscene-octuplets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/those-obscene-octuplets/</link>
	<description>What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:25:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cincy Report &#187; Return of the revenge of the daughter of the Welfare Queen</title>
		<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/those-obscene-octuplets/#comment-20064</link>
		<dc:creator>Cincy Report &#187; Return of the revenge of the daughter of the Welfare Queen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/?p=345#comment-20064</guid>
		<description>[...] I read this analysis of the situation, which I think does a good job of explaining the outrage.  The great storm of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I read this analysis of the situation, which I think does a good job of explaining the outrage.  The great storm of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent discussions - some links &#171; PhD Research Blog</title>
		<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/those-obscene-octuplets/#comment-20055</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent discussions - some links &#171; PhD Research Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/?p=345#comment-20055</guid>
		<description>[...] USAn bloggers identified misogynistic / controlling overtones of the furor surrounding Suleman (The Kugelmass Episodes, The Angry Black Woman, Sybil Vane at Bitch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] USAn bloggers identified misogynistic / controlling overtones of the furor surrounding Suleman (The Kugelmass Episodes, The Angry Black Woman, Sybil Vane at Bitch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Return of the revenge of the daughter of the Welfare Queen &#171; The Angry Black Woman</title>
		<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/those-obscene-octuplets/#comment-20050</link>
		<dc:creator>Return of the revenge of the daughter of the Welfare Queen &#171; The Angry Black Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/?p=345#comment-20050</guid>
		<description>[...] I read this analysis of the situation, which I think does a good job of explaining the outrage.  The great storm of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I read this analysis of the situation, which I think does a good job of explaining the outrage.  The great storm of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nadya Suleman Receives Death Threats</title>
		<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/those-obscene-octuplets/#comment-20049</link>
		<dc:creator>Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nadya Suleman Receives Death Threats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/?p=345#comment-20049</guid>
		<description>[...] Kugelmass has it right: this actually has very little to do with who has to pay what and how many kids an unemployed single mother should or shouldn&#8217;t have. You don&#8217;t get this type of widespread, hyper-violent reaction from a question of economics - not even, I would argue, from people disgusted with the Wall Street bailouts. No, this is about &#8220;the worship of motherhood and the hatred of mothers.&#8221; And I don&#8217;t think you can have one without the other. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kugelmass has it right: this actually has very little to do with who has to pay what and how many kids an unemployed single mother should or shouldn&#8217;t have. You don&#8217;t get this type of widespread, hyper-violent reaction from a question of economics &#8211; not even, I would argue, from people disgusted with the Wall Street bailouts. No, this is about &#8220;the worship of motherhood and the hatred of mothers.&#8221; And I don&#8217;t think you can have one without the other. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadya Suleman Receives Death Threats &#171; Modern Mitzvot</title>
		<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/those-obscene-octuplets/#comment-20048</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadya Suleman Receives Death Threats &#171; Modern Mitzvot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/?p=345#comment-20048</guid>
		<description>[...] Kugelmass has it right: this actually has very little to do with who has to pay what and how many kids an unemployed single mother should or shouldn&#8217;t have. You don&#8217;t get this type of widespread, hyper-violent reaction from a question of economics - not even, I would argue, from people disgusted with the Wall Street bailouts. No, this is about &#8220;the worship of motherhood and the hatred of mothers.&#8221; And I don&#8217;t think you can have one without the other. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kugelmass has it right: this actually has very little to do with who has to pay what and how many kids an unemployed single mother should or shouldn&#8217;t have. You don&#8217;t get this type of widespread, hyper-violent reaction from a question of economics &#8211; not even, I would argue, from people disgusted with the Wall Street bailouts. No, this is about &#8220;the worship of motherhood and the hatred of mothers.&#8221; And I don&#8217;t think you can have one without the other. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profacero</title>
		<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/those-obscene-octuplets/#comment-20047</link>
		<dc:creator>profacero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/?p=345#comment-20047</guid>
		<description>&quot;It is the worship of motherhood, and the hatred of mothers.&quot;

Yes, that sums it up.

I am of course against anyone having any children - we need to reverse population growth. My theory is that some people will be born anyway, so the species won&#039;t die out. But no new people is a good goal since realistically it means we might then get just enough new ones instead of too many.

I also think the idea that everyone should get to have children is strange. I think people who are desperate to have children and can&#039;t conceive but are not willing to adopt are not really that interested in raising children, just in reproducing themselves.

However, it&#039;s weird how upset people are at Suleiman and the tone they&#039;re taking. I do doubt it is possible for one person to take care of 14 babies and toddlers BUT people are freaking out for misogynistic reasons, basically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is the worship of motherhood, and the hatred of mothers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, that sums it up.</p>
<p>I am of course against anyone having any children &#8211; we need to reverse population growth. My theory is that some people will be born anyway, so the species won&#8217;t die out. But no new people is a good goal since realistically it means we might then get just enough new ones instead of too many.</p>
<p>I also think the idea that everyone should get to have children is strange. I think people who are desperate to have children and can&#8217;t conceive but are not willing to adopt are not really that interested in raising children, just in reproducing themselves.</p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s weird how upset people are at Suleiman and the tone they&#8217;re taking. I do doubt it is possible for one person to take care of 14 babies and toddlers BUT people are freaking out for misogynistic reasons, basically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawson</title>
		<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/those-obscene-octuplets/#comment-20045</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/?p=345#comment-20045</guid>
		<description>brilliant piece, such a clear demystification of the &#039;right to life&#039; dictum. i just don&#039;t know if you implicitly (in phrases like &quot;a vivid demonstration of the price that our country pays&quot;) replace one form of &#039;using&#039; the mother with another, though - as if she is &#039;foolish&#039;  because she failed to realise that (the amount of) children should be managed on an economistic level of &#039;cost-benefit&#039; to society. There&#039;s something just as troubling about this neo-liberal submission of motherhood (which inevitably must involve real mothers) to means other than just the fact of procreation. Or am I parsing out the claims wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brilliant piece, such a clear demystification of the &#8216;right to life&#8217; dictum. i just don&#8217;t know if you implicitly (in phrases like &#8220;a vivid demonstration of the price that our country pays&#8221;) replace one form of &#8216;using&#8217; the mother with another, though &#8211; as if she is &#8216;foolish&#8217;  because she failed to realise that (the amount of) children should be managed on an economistic level of &#8216;cost-benefit&#8217; to society. There&#8217;s something just as troubling about this neo-liberal submission of motherhood (which inevitably must involve real mothers) to means other than just the fact of procreation. Or am I parsing out the claims wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
