<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zizek the Embarrassment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/zizek-the-embarrassment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/zizek-the-embarrassment/</link>
	<description>What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:25:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zizek on Haiti &#171; An und für sich</title>
		<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/zizek-the-embarrassment/#comment-19965</link>
		<dc:creator>Zizek on Haiti &#171; An und für sich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/zizek-the-embarrassment/#comment-19965</guid>
		<description>[...] Zizek&#8217;s recent articles have been growing progressively more unhinged &#8212; culminating in &#8220;Zizek the Embarrassment (recently quoted in The Nation), which includes the bizarre claim that we must denounce [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Zizek&#8217;s recent articles have been growing progressively more unhinged &#8212; culminating in &#8220;Zizek the Embarrassment (recently quoted in The Nation), which includes the bizarre claim that we must denounce [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critchley and Lenin &#171; An und für sich</title>
		<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/zizek-the-embarrassment/#comment-19876</link>
		<dc:creator>Critchley and Lenin &#171; An und für sich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/zizek-the-embarrassment/#comment-19876</guid>
		<description>[...] April 17, 2008   In a letter to Harper&#8217;s in response to their reprinting of Zizek&#8217;s infamous quasi-review of Infinitely Demanding, Simon Critchley assimilates Zizek to Lenin and argues that in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] April 17, 2008   In a letter to Harper&#8217;s in response to their reprinting of Zizek&#8217;s infamous quasi-review of Infinitely Demanding, Simon Critchley assimilates Zizek to Lenin and argues that in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zizek&#8217;s Bottoms &#171; American Stranger</title>
		<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/zizek-the-embarrassment/#comment-18182</link>
		<dc:creator>Zizek&#8217;s Bottoms &#171; American Stranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 02:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/zizek-the-embarrassment/#comment-18182</guid>
		<description>[...] around, it seems to me that if Zizek&#8217;s regular public displays and the regular reactions of blogviators offer any lasting &#8216;theoretical&#8217; insight it is that nothing is entirely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] around, it seems to me that if Zizek&#8217;s regular public displays and the regular reactions of blogviators offer any lasting &#8216;theoretical&#8217; insight it is that nothing is entirely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/zizek-the-embarrassment/#comment-17658</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/zizek-the-embarrassment/#comment-17658</guid>
		<description>your argument seemed like it was going here until you made it about Zizek&#039;s &quot;egotism&quot;.  It is not that he thinks that he is the only one who can criticize liberal democracy, but rather that the left is having a lot of trouble coming to grips with what this would even mean.  He is for criticizing liberal democracy but against &quot;resisting&quot; it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your argument seemed like it was going here until you made it about Zizek&#8217;s &#8220;egotism&#8221;.  It is not that he thinks that he is the only one who can criticize liberal democracy, but rather that the left is having a lot of trouble coming to grips with what this would even mean.  He is for criticizing liberal democracy but against &#8220;resisting&#8221; it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: and i don&#8217;t care about the little u&#8217;s above zizek&#8217;s name. &#171; American Stranger</title>
		<link>http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/zizek-the-embarrassment/#comment-15807</link>
		<dc:creator>and i don&#8217;t care about the little u&#8217;s above zizek&#8217;s name. &#171; American Stranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kugelmass.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/zizek-the-embarrassment/#comment-15807</guid>
		<description>[...] Kugelmass is the only libeleftral academic blogger thus far willing to call a spade a spade, though he&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kugelmass is the only libeleftral academic blogger thus far willing to call a spade a spade, though he&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
